Calendar proposal (#58)
After a conversation over lunch today, I decided to offer the
following proposal and hope that serious consideration can be given to
it under the right circumstance. If all else fails (the "right
circumstance"), we should at least consider reversing the present
winter and spring terms, i.e., have a twelve-week term from January
through March with an eight-week term following during April and May. I
offer the following rationales for this modest calendar change:
- a twelve-week winter term would provide a longer period during which
to recover (course content coverage) from inclement-weather class cancellations;
- a twelve-week winter term would provide a longer period of time
during which both students and instructors could recover from absences
due to winter term illnesses;
- "spring break" could actually occur in early spring (what a novel idea!),
- present winter term study abroad programs could be shifted to
warmer weather in April and May or kept in the January-through-March
time frame with the possibility of extending their durations and/or
geographic coverages; and
- if we are serious about extending access to study abroad
experiences for more of our students, the twelve-week fall term study
abroad programs could be repeated during a twelve-week winter term with
little change in organization or structure.
- Winter term preregistration advisement is as long and time
consuming as is fall term advisement since during both terms we have to
deal with all four student classes. However, the winter term advisement
period extends over a larger proportion of the winter term. It is for
this reason that many conscientious advisors regard winter-term
advisement as more burdensome than is fall term advisement. With a
winter-spring term flip-flop, winter term advisement would extend over
a smaller proportion of a 12-week winter term. Spring term advisement
is always shorter than either fall or winter term advisment periods
because we have to deal with only three student classes. This shorter
spring term advisement period would be better suited to an 8-week
spring term than the winter term advisment of all four student classes
is to the present 8-week winter term.
I would consider the proposed "flip-flopping" of the winter and
spring terms to be a marginal improvement that should benefit almost
everyone (except possibly some seniors who might choose not to do study
abroad programs during spring terms before their graduations), and I
urge that serious consideration be given to this proposal if consensus
cannot be reached on other curriculum/calendar proposals.
Posted by love at November 19, 2004 09:45 AM
Discuss this proposal in the forum, or leave a comment below!
I think this is a very wise and Furman-appropriate proposal. You
raise very good points. Furman would be able to retain its "unique"
academic schedule and students would not have to take 5-6 classes
simultaneously. Plus, students can handle 2 compacted, more intense
classes (like those of the current Winter Term) with far fewer nervous
breakdowns during the lovely days of Spring!